There is seriously something wrong with some Americans in this country of ours. I just read an article in today's USA Today about tornado warnings which are a vital form of lifesaving communications being a nuisance to television viewers. It seems that the tornado warning that devastated Dayton, Ohio interrupted the showing of The Bachelor reality show. The outburst of venom appeared on social media regarding the television channel having the gall to cut into that program which I guess is vital to the national security of that community. It also indicated that when Tiger Woods won the Masters in April viewers around Atlanta was so disturbed by these storm warning they have sent death threats to the station's weather person. I mean really why are so many people in this country on some kind of intellectual downslope. They seemed to be so captivated by the reality-driven media syndrome that has captured their subconscious, that they are willing to risk life and limb not to be disturbed during these reality driven shows that have no true significance in the higher level model of thought that should be frequented by a supposed level thinking human being.

Hey, a tornado is in your neighborhood take cover. Don't bother me Tiger Woods is about to sink that 15 foot shot for par. The winds are cataclysmic and swooping up and demolishing homes down the street. Who cares, this Bachelor is about to decide whether or not to shove contestant number three out of the car on their date. The question I ask is are Americans are being dumbed down intentionally? Are we being subjected to these asinine shows to keep us distracted from the real issues that we are presented with? Is our government's communication systems set up to dull our senses and make us less critically aware. There is a huge difference between individuals who read and acquire knowledge and individual who gain knowledge from watching television/cable shows geared to the level of 3rd and 4th-grade readers. So the next time you are wondering whether Brittany Spears does or doesn't post her own videos, or whether its Taco Tuesday Night at LeBron James house or other insignificant media driven trash that is spewed on us daily to distract us from critically being aware of the environment around us. Wonder this, will the day come that the majority of our nation will be so dumbed down that they will have lost absolute control of themselves? Handing over that control for the sake of insignificance and nonsense. Just a thought, or has it already happened? Look who is running our government now, is he not a reality-based media creation? Damn, it's already happened we'd better wake up quick before its too late.

Of course, the Justice Department couldn't indict a sitting President, in the American system of government, we have three separate and distinct branch of the one larger tree, the legislative, the executive and the judicial. The Justice Department falls under not the judicial branch but falls under the executive branch, so the Justice Department answers to the Executive Branch of the federal government. In our US Constitution, specific checks and balances are in place to ensure justice is evenly applied. So only Congress, first the people's House of Representative can impeach or try a sitting President. Once that House impeachment process has rendered a decision, then the US Senate votes on the House's impeachment. If both Houses of the Legislative Branches of the US Government vote to impeach the sitting President is then and only then impeached from office. At that time the Justice Department can indict the former sitting President because he no longer heads the Executive Branch of Government. He is now a private citizen who must uphold the laws as a private citizen and is past actions as President are then indictable.


So what Robert Mueller was saying in his press conference was simply this, if the American people want this case to be adjudicated in a courtroom. It must first, and foremost be adjudicated in the halls of Congress. Mueller simply delivered a slam shot to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Nancy Pelosi can either return service and play the point. Or she can refuse service and pass on the impeachment. So it's no need to over analyze what Robert Mueller said because what he said was irrelevant to Trump's guilt or innocence. The decision can only be made by those two houses of the legislative branch, US House of Representatives and the US Senate. If and when the Senate votes on impeachment. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court will oversee the proceedings but the only determining factors will be a simple majority vote from the US Senators.

This is how our federal government works. No Justice Department appointee could indict Richard Nixon during Watergate, nor could the US Attorney General indict Andrew Johnson during his acts of Confederate sabotage in 1865. These were two historical instances of impeachment proceeding in America. The most recent case was the failed attempt by the Republican Party to evict Bill Clinton for lying about having sex with a White House intern. So, if you know your history you would've known that indictments coming from Mueller's Investigation wouldn't have borne any fruits of indictments against Trump. Robert Meuller gathered the evidence. Now Pelosi must decide if the criminal actions of obstruction reportedly done by the sitting President rise to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors. The ball is in and has been in Pelosi court the day she was elected Speaker of the House of Representative.